Skip to main content

Understanding no-contest clauses in light of the Inheritance Act 1975

In the realm of estate planning, one often encounters the delicate balance between a testator's intentions and the rights of potential beneficiaries, especially given the existence of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (Inheritance Act).

  • 20 May 2024
  • Share on:
Family walking together outdoors along coastal path

The Inheritance Act allows certain categories of individuals to make claims against an estate if they believe that reasonable financial provision has not been made for them in a deceased’s Will. These categories include spouses, children, cohabitees, and others who were financially dependent on the deceased. While allowing potential beneficiaries to challenge a Will under certain circumstances ensures that the testator's wishes are not executed in a manner that is unjust or unfair, it arguably restricts a person’s testamentary freedom.

What is a no-contest clause?

One option is for a testator to include a no-contest clause in their Will. Typically, these clauses stipulate that if a beneficiary challenges the validity of the Will or seeks additional provision under the Inheritance Act, they risk forfeiting their inheritance entirely or receiving a reduced share. The rationale behind such clauses is twofold. Firstly, they serve to uphold the testator's wishes by minimising disputes and ensuring that the distribution of assets proceeds according to their instructions. Secondly, by acting as a deterrent against bringing a claim under the Inheritance Act, they aim to protect the estate from unnecessary litigation expenses and protracted legal battles, thereby preserving its value for the intended beneficiaries.

Sim v Pimlott & Ors

No-contest clauses in light of the Inheritance Act have been recently considered in the case of Sim v Pimlott & Ors. Dr Sim and his wife, Mrs Sim, were married for 19 years and together for a total of 35 years. The relationship was turbulent; Mrs Sim had accused her husband of domestic and sexual abuse and had sought legal protection orders against him. Given this context, Dr Sim was keen to leave Mrs Sim very little in his Will. Dr Sim was advised by his solicitor, however, that should he not make reasonable financial provision for his wife in his Will,  she may bring a claim against his estate under the Inheritance Act. 

In an attempt to avoid such a claim, Dr Sim left his wife a cash sum of £250,000, a gift of £125,000, on the proviso that Mrs Sim release her interest from a property in Dubai, and a life interest in the residue of the estate in his Will. The cash gifts were drafted as no- contest clauses. Despite this, upon Dr Sim’s death, Mrs Sim still brought a claim against his estate under the Inheritance Act, arguing that the Will did not adequately provide for her. 

The court was asked to consider: whether Dr Sim’s Will did reasonably provide for Mrs Sim financially; whether the inclusion of a no-contest clause was reasonable; and whether a person can argue that a Will has failed to make a reasonable financial provision despite the inclusion of an effective no-contest clause.

The decision

The court found that Dr Sim had adequately provided for his wife in his Will and that therefore, it was reasonable of him to have included a no-contest clause. Due to this, the judge held that Mrs Sim had now lost her entitlement to the cash legacies left to her by her late husband.   

Poignantly, this meant that Mrs Sim was no longer reasonably provided for financially. However, the judge held that it would be unjust for a person to bring a claim under the Inheritance Act, knowingly forgoing a benefit, only to argue afterward that the Will does not adequately provide for them due to this forfeiture. Considering this, Mrs Sim was not able to argue that as she was no longer receiving the cash gifts, her late husband’s Will did not adequately provide for her.   

The ruling in Sim v Pimlott & Ors reaffirms the importance of weighing up the potential benefits to contesting a will against the risks involved, especially where a no-contest clause is included in an objectively rational Will. The case also highlights that, on the drafting of a Will, careful consideration must be had to the appropriateness of a no-contest clause, ensuring it strikes a balance: not set too low, which could still result in a successful Inheritance Act claim, nor set too high, as it would partially undermine the testator's intentions.

How TWM can help you

Whether you are weighing up the decision to include a no-contest clause in your Will, or you are a beneficiary considering challenging a Will, our dedicated Wills, Trust and Estate Disputes team has the expertise and experience to guide you through the process.

Please get in touch with our team of specialist solicitors who can provide tailored legal advice to suit your individual needs.

Related insights

  • 08 October 2026

How trusts can protect your assets and provide for your family

Read more
  • 08 September 2026

TWM Solicitors strengthens Private Client team with appointment of new partner

Read more
  • 02 September 2026

TWM Solicitors strengthens teams with newly qualified solicitors

Read more
  • 20 August 2026

Steering clients towards mediation: a practical guide for solicitors

Read more

Contact us

Here's how to get in touch if you have any questions at all or would like to speak to us about your enquiry. Please complete the form below and one of our experts will get in touch to discuss how we can help.

Fields marked with indicate required fields

Would you be happy for us to call you?
Would you like us to keep you up to date with our latest news and insights?

Your marketing preferences can be changed at any time here

Do you agree to our privacy policy?

By ticking this box, you agree to our terms. We will only use the information you provide to handle your enquiry.
The information you submit will be handled in accordance with our privacy policy

We're here to help

Call us

0330 555 0440

Make an enquiry

Message us