We regularly find ourselves advising both individuals and employers about appeals against dismissal. The implications of appealing are not widely known, but can have significant consequences. A string of cases in recent years have considered the effect and established some important principles.
Why appeal against dismissal?
It makes a lot of sense for employees to appeal against decisions to dismiss them, after all it promises the possibility that the employer will reconsider and reverse the dismissal. Appeals are also encouraged since, in some circumstances, awards for successful claims of unfair dismissal can be subject to reductions of up to 25% if a right of appeal has not been pursued. Inevitably some individuals only appeal against their dismissal to maximise the money they might recover if they successfully pursue a claim of unfair dismissal and they may have no desire or intention of returning to their job.
What is the effect of a successful appeal?
However, matters are not quite so simple. The Court of Appeal decision in Roberts v West Coast Trains Ltd is the leading case. This, and subsequent cases, have developed a clear principle that when an employer decides an internal appeal against dismissal in favour of an employee, this revokes the dismissal. The effect is to erase the dismissal and the employment relationship is treated as if it had existed throughout. This applies even if the employee does not in truth wish to continue in employment.
Although the cases have involved contractual appeals, it is likely that the contractual status of the appeal process makes little difference. The case of Salmon v Castlebeck Care (Teesside) Ltd again concerned a contractual right of appeal, but the Employment Appeal Tribunal commented that it is implicit in any internal appeal that success will negate the dismissal regardless of whether the appeal is governed by a contract. This view was adopted by both parties in the more recent case of Marangakis v Iceland Foods Ltd, which went on to see the Employment Appeal Tribunal recognise that a dismissal will vanish following a successful appeal regardless of the employee’s wishes.
What are the implications of the dismissal vanishing?
The implications of erasing the dismissal are significant. The employee can no longer claim unfair dismissal – there is no longer a dismissal. However, there is usually an entitlement to back pay. The employee may also respond by resigning to pursue a claim of constructive unfair dismissal based upon the employer’s conduct, since the history of what has taken place is not erased. If so, the employee will be responsible for establishing that there has been a fundamental breach of contract that justifies resigning and treating themselves as constructively dismissed and that dismissal will then also have to be accepted as unfair by an Employment Tribunal if the employee’s claim is to succeed.
When does a successful appeal against dismissal take effect?
There are further interesting aspects to the case of Salmon v Castlebeck Care (Teesside) Ltd. It was decided that upholding an appeal has the effect of erasing the dismissal without the need for an express direction to reinstate. Just as significantly, this becomes effective as soon as the appeal is decided, which means that the dismissal can be erased before the employee is told.
Employees and employers alike need to consider carefully how to handle appeals against dismissal. If you are thinking of submitting an appeal against your dismissal, or if you are an employer dealing with an appeal, our Employment team has the knowledge and experience to advise you.
For further information or advice on appealing against a dismissal, please contact email@example.com.
For further details about our Employment Law services, click here.